In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 12/12/2006
at 12:31 PM, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Why not? IBM does.
IBM has posted, *ON THIS LIST*, that USS is *not* a correct
abbreviation for Unix System Services. Individual IBM employees may
have misused the term, just as individual IBM employees may have
misused the term BSC.
Further, there is a sound reason to to make USS a formal abbreviation
for Unix Services; the fact that you need to configure USS in order to
provide access to Unix Services, or at least to configure a component
with the same syntax.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
