In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 12/21/2006
at 10:03 PM, "Robert A. Rosenberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Most NEW SVCs are single Module and thus in theory Type3 but most
>old SVCs (Such as OPEN, CLOSE, and others), are still multi-Module
>and thus Type4.
I don't know about most, but OPEN, CLOSE and EOV were restructured as
part of the original AOS2 (OS/VS2) development; the WTG table uses
addresses rather than TTRs.
>SVC 109 SVCs are all Type4 (even if only one module) but are named
>IGXyyxxx.
Those are ESR routines rather than SVC routines.
>You call "SVC 109" with yyxxx in R15.
No, just yy.
>Thus if I load F'15245' into R15 and issue a SVC 109 it will link
>to IGX15245.
No, but load if you load F'15' into R15 and issue a SVC 109 it will
link to IGX15109.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
