In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/02/2007
at 08:44 PM, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Not obvious, apparently, to IBM (nor to many contributors to this
>list (I am not among them), who would prefer to see the restriction
>remain).
FSVO "many".
I've seen messages criticizing specific implementation suggestions,
discussing costs and suggesting that those who need the support submit
formal requirements. I don't recall "many" posters saying that they
preferred to see the restriction remain.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
