On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:30:50 -0500, Craddock, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>... >>The question of who's on first is kinda silly, but I have seen >developers convince themselves that they just -had- to be first. As we >know, there's really no rational way to ensure that it so. >... Those that merely inspect are satisfied with being first. Those that modify probably want to be both first and last. >... >It might be easier all around if IBM surveyed the current usage of those >hooks and offered new dynamic exit intercepts, or in some cases perhaps >just new ENF signals, so products can get notified of the things the >need to see and get out of the BCP's panties at the same time. >... That would be fine for those that just want to look. I don't think that would satisfy those that "know" they need to modify something. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
