That may be true, but sadly not relevant in this context. z/os under z/VM is not qualified for zNALC.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of McKown, John Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: z New Application License Charges (zNALC) Announced > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hal Merritt > Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2007 1:19 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: z New Application License Charges (zNALC) Announced > > > Agreed. But it does. There is a proposed stepwise procedure where you > first change the name to '*', then to the target name. I plan to test > that on my DR box in a week or so. All of which simply proves the inherent superiority of z/VM over LPAR. -- John McKown Senior Systems Programmer HealthMarkets Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage Administrative Services Group Information Technology NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message, together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
