z/OS.e and NALC are the same price. The primary difference being the
limitations of z/OS.e and that z/OS.e could be a sub-capacity pricing metric
while NALC was full capacity. 

Ed was correct that zNALC is priced lower than either once the billable MSUs
are above 45MSUs. The difference is not large, at 175 MSUs z/OS.e is $6,300
and z/OS with zNALC is $6,040 (USD). 

The big difference between NALC and zNALC is sub-capacity in an LPAR rather
than a dedicated machine. Also it seems more clear cut to me as to what is a
"Qualifying Workload" for zNALC. While the zNALC LPAR is to be dedicated to
the "Qualifying Workload" the database server used for the "Qualifying
Workload" can also be in the zNALC partition. This allows DB2 to be with
WebSphere if DB2 is the database server for a WebSphere "Qualifying Workload". 

Al Sherkow, I/S Management Strategies, Ltd.
Consulting Expertise on Capacity Planning, Performance Tuning,
WLC, LPARs, IRD and LCS Software
Seminars on IBM SW Pricing, LPARs, and IRD
Voice: +1 414 332-3062 
Web: www.sherkow.com

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to