I'm not so sure about "out of the planning stage".

When a large community college district located in Southern California shot
themselves in the foot (IMHO) and dumped their 370/158 for a Honeywell
Series 6000 (without Multics, but GCOS 7 + TSS) in the early 1980's, a "B"
language compiler came with the system.

(The experiences with this Honeywell eventually led to an historic event -
the low bidder _not_ getting a contract - when Prime was awarded a contract
for minis to replace Xerox 530s, over the Honeywell Series 6 - which had the
audacity to crash during benchmarking under a load of less than 10 users,
thus the benchmark was never completed.  Honeywell threatened legal action
for not getting the bid but eventually realized that they did not have a
case since they had not completed the benchmark.)

Later,
Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Monday January 15 2007 20:34
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Special characters in passwords was Re: RACF - Password rules .

At 12:56 -0500 on 01/15/2007, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote about 
Re: Special characters in passwords was Re: RACF - Password:

>  >Isn't "C" the language that grades itself?
>
>Then why isn't it called F?

Because after they got C going that did not want to risk creating a D 
to replace it (but went on to C+ and then C++ [getting "Better" each 
time]). You do know that C was proceeded by a B (which never made it 
out of the planning stage).

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to