On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:42:41 -0600, Steve Horein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi all! >I'm looking for some advice: How best to order our LNKLST concatenation? Is >there a measure of or statistics for datasets used in LNKLST? At present, >the pecking order doesn't seem to have much of logical order at all! > Order doesn't matter (except in the case of duplicate modules!). A hashing technique is used for module lookup from the LLA directory. The only time the libraries are searched one at a time is when LLA is inactive or not managing the LNKLST (which it does by default). Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group - GITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
