Have you checked the DCB attributes for the ISPF DD allocations? - if you have a logon exec/clist it could be including datasets that are not in other peoples environment.
Does the exec work in batch? If so - what happens? Rob Scott Rocket Software, Inc 275 Grove Street Newton, MA 02466 617-614-2305 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.rs.com/portfolio/mxi_g2 -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thompson, Steve (SCI TW) Sent: 17 January 2007 10:03 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Scott Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 8:44 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: ABEND U999 in ISPF Steve, >From the ISPF Msgs and Codes book : Abend code 999 (or X'3E7') This abend is issued for the following reasons: <snip> Yes, I know. I have a printed copy of those two pages. It is why I killed my profile D/S and had it rebuilt. I have captured the dump from this. I can't find why ISPMAIN decided to ABEND U0999. However, in the dump I found several IOS10002I messages. But I seriously doubt this is the problem, or everyone here using this exec would have the problem. But I get it using the original or with my changes. Later, Steve Thompson ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
