On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 13:30 -0500, Craddock, Chris wrote:

> Don't forget that (AFAIK) all currently supported processors support
> some form of xMIF, meaning that you don't really need actual physical
> CTCs for connections within the same
> CEC/Box/<your_favorite_name_for_a_box> so if you're just connecting
> LPARS in the same machine you can do it trivially.

Last time I looked at this (z/990), CTCs still required a loop of real
glass. We had to specially order short ones, and even checked the
requirement depending on whether the two ports were in the same area
(front/back), or needed to reach from front to back.
Sure you can EMIF them, but you can't totally virtualize them.

Now (peer-mode) coupling links, that's a different kettle of fish.
Irrelevant here apparently.

> There is NO GOOD REASON to run monoplexes in preference to at least a basic 
> sysplex.

Much as I'm a fan of sysplex, sharing everything ain't *always* the best
answer. Massaging significantly disparate WLM policies together can get
"interesting". Probably less of an issue if coming from a single CEC
environment.

Shane ...

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to