In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
01/17/2007
at 12:46 AM, "Craddock, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>It will work FSVO of "work" but the proposed solution has the same
>set of issues that STATUS does.
No, it has a different set of issues. Several of the cases where
STATUS STOP is dangerous will delay the IRB until it is safe. The flip
side is that you have to be very careful what you do in the IRB.
Either approach looks risky, but the problems are not the same.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
