In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 01/17/2007
at 01:42 PM, "Rugen, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Do I need to setup GRS (yuck) in a ring to safely share PDSES?
Star is preferred, but you do need GRS.
>I don't think I want or need XCF.
XCF is part and parcel of sysplex.
In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 01/17/2007
at 03:39 PM, "Rugen, Len" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Isn't XCF the coupling facility?
No; XCF can run over a CTCA for basic sysplex.
>I'm only a 2-way processor, wouldn't I
>have to sacrifice one processor to the CF LPAR?
No. You don't need a CF for basic sysplex, and you can[1] share a
process for the CF LPAR if you go that route.
[1] There are, of course, performance ramifications.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
