On Wed, 31 Jan 2007 08:09:17 -0600, McKown, John 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
>The reason to compress on the mainframe was to reduce the time needed to
>ftp. Trying to ftp 21 MEDIA2 tapes (3490E) worth of data to my PC (over
>100Mb ethernet) scares me. 

Actually it's probably not that bad.  I leave an ftp server running on my 
PC overnight to transfer AWS files. Times vary from 20 to 120 minutes, 
depending on what else is going on.  IMON says that TCPIP, a USS 
application running at high priority, gobbles CPU when in use, but my batch 
FTP job runs at the lowest priority so the use is not too bad.

Somewhere I am sure I have a GZIP that runs on MVS, but that may be from a 
previous incarnation when I had a C compiler.

I suggest you test different suggestions.

Dave

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to