I'd be afraid of this especially if they're SMS managed. Roll in seems to have problem with gaps and manual generations but ....
---> Snip >I want to create twelve GDGs, prefix.whatever.JAN, prefix.whatever.FEB >and so forth. > >Then, instead of creating prefix.whatever.JAN(+1) I want to create >prefix.whatever.JAN.G(day-of-month-with-leading-zeroes)V00 with >DISP=(NEW,CATLG). > >In essence one generation per day of month, with missing generations if we >don't run that day (state holiday or whatever). > >Then I want to be able to read prefix.whatever.JAN as the complete set, >as you can do with GDGs. > >Are there any holes in this theory that I'm overlooking? > <----- UnSnip Jack Kelly LA Systems @ US Courts x 202-502-2390 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
