No, no. I'm including those datasets into the "necessary set". I was talking about adding more data sets to the MCAT.
2007/2/1, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 1 Feb 2007 08:21:27 +0100, Víctor de la Fuente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >From my little knowledge, I prefer not cataloging more datasets than >necessary in the master. I don't know if this is a wrong positioning. Is it? No. But I don't consider IBM "SYS1" data sets that are part of the OS you are running "more than necessary". Just personal preference whether you want dlibs cataloged or not. My personal preference is "yes" as long as symbolics are used and updated as part of any dlib rollout - be it maintenance or OS upgrade (I haven't cloned DLIBs with maintenance in quiet a long time... one zone, one (set) dlib volume(s) ). Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
