On Sat, 10 Feb 2007 14:46:51 +0100, Víctor de la Fuente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm here again. Hope one day I can be the answerer... > >I couldn't find a place with a recommendation for HFS allocation. So I'd >like to hear your opinions about it. Do you prefer SMS or non-SMS? Why? > Non-SMS. Then you can treat it just like and other sysres data set and indirectly catalog it - whether it's on the primary sysres volume or a secondary (or tirtiary) volume. But I wouldn't want to SMS control any "sysres" data sets. This was one of the driving factors for supporting non-SMS PDSE and HFS when that support came out (OS/390 2.6 and above + PTFs and native in OS/390 2.10 IIRC). Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
