I did open a PMR, and they told me that the inconsistent VTOCIX name was the
cause of the problem.
Later, when I post my considerations to the list and read your update, I
started to think that the name
inconsistency alone had nothing to do with it. Then I found this SER NO field, and decided to delete/build
the VTOCIX from scratch, which worked. I can't prove it, but I think that if I'd have renamed the VTOCIX
alone, i.e. with IEHPROGM, the problem would be still there.
Even if IBM Level 2 was right, this is not a documented requirement.
But I think you are correct about the SERNO field. I have a tool which
can modify the field, so I will try to run a test.
--
Bruce A. Black
Senior Software Developer for FDR
Innovation Data Processing 973-890-7300
personal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sales info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tech support: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.innovationdp.fdr.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
