In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 02/12/2007
at 04:23 PM, Itschak Mugzach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>If XYZ need the authority, why shouldn't he get them directly?
Because most of the time he doesn't need them.
>This way you will know who is using the resource,
You'll still know.
>It is exactly like putting ABC's password on a paper near the keyboard or
>terminal.
Bshum panim v'ofen lo! (No way!)
If I give A surrogate authority to B, that doesn't let C submit jobs
with USERID=B.
>I wouldn't give surrogate to users but applications (like a job
>scheduler).
It's not my dog.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
