I would use the IBM way Object code. Object code is 80 bytes in length and can be covered with ptf text & letter. BTW, you do not need to supply the CICS interface (e.g. cics stub module for cobol) , if your customer has CICS to run your product, they should have the interface installed.
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 3:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: SMPE packaging - load modules or CSECTs > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD. > > I posted this question on the FLEX-ES list and got back 1 > reply, which included a suggestion to also ask for responses > here on IBM-MAIN. > > For a bit of background, our applications are all single > CSECT load modules, with the only common exception being > those running under CICS, that are linked with the CICS > execution interface stub (which has so far shown to be > upward/downward compatible for decades). > > It is therefore easiest for us to supply updates in the form > of replacement load modules, meaning we fix the source code, > recompile and relink before packaging. > > What sayeth yee all? Sounds reasonable to me. "Big" thing is to ensure your PREREQs and COREQs are accurate. -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
