In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 02/27/2007
at 10:29 AM, Alan Schwartz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Early in January Russ Witt sent the list a warning about the
>implications apar OA17011 could have on tape retention. We've had
>some discussions about this apar internally; not concerning the
>technical impact but the fact that there was no hold on it. I'm
>not suggesting that it should have a hold
Then I will; it should have a hold.
>So I'm asking the group "when you're applying preventative
>maintenance do you read and analyze the cover information for every
>ptf being applied?"
IMHO that would be a practical impossibility. I have, however, always
read the text of every unresolved hold, including DOC, before
installing service.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
