Likewise I am also using 40gb tape for my ML2 data. Recall of the second dataset on the second volume took 23 seconds, a bit below my average of 27 seconds. Recall of the dataset causing the connection took 1 min 15 seconds. Now I have 5 connected ML2 tape sets so I have 5 datasets that IF recalled will invoke 2 tape mounts taking significantly longer than average to recall. 5 datasets out of 1.3 million occurances. Somehow I don't see this as a significant problem.
What is your tapespansize parameter set at? -----Original Message----- From: Murrell, Aldridge (CDC) Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:12 AM To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU Subject: Re: DFSMSHSM migration spanning volumes We are using 40gb volumes for ML2 and am trying to minimize time for recall. Another reason is to keep all data on single volumes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
