[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please be more specific. There are about 100 articles on that web page.
I'm not sure I understand your reference ... with respect to post ... copy here
at
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007f.html#0 FBA rant
there is
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/index.html
what has a number of URLs in different categories
including a pointer to html file:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007e.html
this particular HTML file has index with 66 articles (numeric
labels 0-65)
the specific URL I was referencing in the post was
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007e.html#64
most browsers would position within the file at label "64". If your
browser isn't capable of handling a URL that includes positioning
within a file ... then the index at the front of file
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007e.html
has 66 entries and "64" is the next to the last index entry (numbered
from zero). I'm not sure that will do you any good though ... since
if your browser can handle the original URL with relative position
... it also can't handle the relative URL in the index either.
Now there is another possibility that you may be having. I recently
updated file
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007e.html
with most recent posts. If your browser has a earlier version of
2007e.html cached, that was obtained before the last couple postings
were added to the file ... then it would not be able to find the new
relative position (within the file as specified) and just position you
at the front of the file.
It also depends on how you may have configured your browser cache
settings ... some browsers have an option to check on consistency of
what is in the cache and the original either once per file after each
startup or check for consistency on every reference.
In any case, you usually can synchronize what might be in your browser
cache and the original file by hitting the reload button.
Now you repeat your same comment with respect to "their being 100 articles on
that
web page" ... and have used the comment both with respect to
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007e.html#64
and
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/gcard.html#26.1
Looking at the body of you post ... there seems to be some issue with whatever
you are
using that has trailing underscore on some flavors of URL ... I don't know
whether
your browser processor is adding that trailing underscore or not ... it doesn't
exist in the original.
Now, I can see where your browser might have a stale cached copy of 2007e.html ... and not being able to find relative href/name "64" within the file ... but the file gcard.html has had href/name of "26.1" since it was first made available ... so it would seem unlikely that you would have stale caching problems with both
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2007e.html#64
and
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/gcard.html#26.1
not being able to find the relative position in both files. Possibly you are having
browser problems? Other possibility is possibly you have some DNS cache poisoning
and your browser isn't actually getting to my real web pages?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
