On Wed, 7 Mar 2007 17:33:04 -0500, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>SVS was MVT with Virtual Storage (a 16Meg Machine). > >>VS1 was similarly MFT with VS. > > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > Atid/2 <http://patriot.net/~shmuel> Seymour, was SVS and/or VS1 what you ran on a 360 or 370 processor with a DAT box? Or did MVT or MFT run native on those systems with a DAT box? THANX, Mark H. Young FFX County Gov't VA ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
