Could it be that case matters? When you edited it, did it change to all
uppercase, for example?
Regards,
Roger Bolan
IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 03/13/2007
10:19:08 AM:
> I coded a module using Steve's example and got the same return code.
> So i changed DD to FI and DSN to DA and got a zero return code (and a
> successful dynamic allocation).
>
> I guess I messed up the original parmlist I coded as well when I got
> Steve's result - DD and DSN work as well as FI and DA.
>
> Never mind.
> -Emily L
>
> On 3/13/07, Paul Gilmartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In a recent note, Rich Tabor said:
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 05:34:15 -0700
> > >
> > > I think you will have better luck using FI and DA instead of DD and
DSN.
> > >
> > Why?
> >
> > -- gil
> > --
> > StorageTek
> > INFORMATION made POWERFUL
> >
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
