On Tue, 13 Mar 2007 13:09:02 -0400, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does anyone use message IEE889I (the response to D C) for >automation? If so, how big a deal would it be to change it (for >example, if we were to change the message ID and format of the >response)? > ... My original response never made it to IBM-Main. Sorry if it eventually shows up. I "automated" the response to D C for a while at my previous shop. I don't remember if that was still the case when I left. If so, that automation is probably still in effect. This was not strictly "message automation". I issued a D C command from NetView and processed whatever response was correlated with the command. I doubt I checked the message ID. I doubt the people in the company that absorbed my old shop know this automation is in place (if it IS still in place), and it will be tricky for them to find. Searching for IEE889I will probably do no good even if they are alerted to do so by HOLD AO data. This is a potential problem whenever the response to a command is changed. If IBM made no changes because someone might be effected, we would all still be running PCP. Flagging the change AO is about all you can do. Pat O'Keefe ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
