> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of john gilmore
>
> Chris Craddock writes:
>
> >I don't know that there's any particular rhyme or reason to the
> >numbering scheme.
>
> and I should agree in general. There is, however, one ROT
> that I have found very useful: When a supplanting release i
> + 1 is announced before release i is shipped, avoid release i.
IIRC, CICS TS 2.2 was announced before 2.1 shipped. However, 2.1 had
been announced as an "early adopter" release for whatever new
functionality was being offered, and ISTR that the 2.1 announcement
recommended that "production" users of CICS TS should wait for 2.2.
Another trivium regarding CICS TS: Each of the first two versions
delivered three release levels.
-jc-
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
