In a recent note, "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" said: > Subject: Re: SDSF "?" display > > First, why shouldn't the requirement be on SDSF? If JES2 can print the > data sets in the proper order then SDSF should be able to display them > in that order. > Does JES2 make the necessary interfaces available to SDSF?
> Second, why should SDSF impose a requirement on JES3 > when it doesn't support JES3? > Does that suggest a requirement to you? > Third, what is the "proper" order for spinoff data sets? > No good answer, since spinoff data sets print first, but it's clearly impossible to display them before earlier steps execute. I'd say job step order is still most convenient for the viewer. They should be viewable ASAP, and it should be possible to list them in the same chronological order. I'd certainly find the order in which they were opened more intuitive than having all dynamically allocated data sets appear last. -- gil -- StorageTek INFORMATION made POWERFUL ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
