I agree with what everyone else basically said.  Still easy to use, better for 
remote access, etc.   Did seem a little bit slower - at least from a remote
user's standpoint.   The first time I used a real one was at DR a couple of
weeks ago. 

No one has mentioned the new format of the interface.  I presume that
is because almost everyone uses the compatibility mode, which is known
as "Classic Style".    If you change it to "Tree Style", things look radically 
different.  Tree style is more like an win-doze explorer type of view.  
A tree of expandable servers, groups, and management folders on 
the left side and contents and tasks on the right side.    I played with
it for a while but everyone else I work with complained so I changed
it back to classic style.  BTW, I'm glad IBM used the work classic and
not legacy.  :-)

Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group:  G-ITO
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to