Hi,
We had been tracking this and have applied it along with a lot of other
service to a SYSRES set that is rotating into our test partitions this
coming Friday. I will let you know next week how it has gone.
I don't understand why when different IBM teams are doing functions
which reside in one node of the Sysplex like CNS, RMF Master Gathering
for CFDETAIL they don't provide a PREFLIST similar to Coupling Facility
structures with the initial implementation. The idea that every Sysplex
member is equally capable and loved is not true often from what I see in
the wild. Customers want to at least give hints on what systems are
best suited for running functions as long as there is a choice.
Best Regards,
Sam Knutson, GEICO
Performance and Availability Management
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(office) 301.986.3574
"Think big, act bold, start simple, grow fast..."
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of J Ellis
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2007 10:23 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: GRS CNS apar OA11382
Has anyone applied the ptf for apar OA11382 on a 1.7 system that allows
you to move the grs/cns to a different system via operator command? It
was retro- fitted from z/OS 1.8. Work as adverstised ? brought
everything to a screeching halt ?
====================
This email/fax message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of this
email/fax is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
destroy all paper and electronic copies of the original message.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
