Gerhard Adam wrote:
In PCP, MFT and MVT, SVC 99 didn't even exist! Nor TSO.
I guess one could say, in a round about sort of way, that IEFBR14 was
the front end to invoking the DASD allocation, scratch and catalog SVCs?
I'm sorry, but you still can't say it no matter how "round_about" your
explanation. IEFBR14 doesn't front-end anything. In addition, you shouldn't confuse SVC
99 (Dynamic Allocation) with allocation routines. While they may achieve the same end
result, they aren't the same thing.
Adam
Sorry. I know that. I was just trying to be generous. And I thought
my next sentence would make that clear.
But I can see how a newcomer could think that, particularly from a Unix
or Windows environment.
Clem
,-._|\ Clement V. Clarke - Author Jol, EASYJCL, EASYPANEL, 370TO486
/ Oz \ Web: http://www.ozemail.com.au/~oscarptyltd
\_,--.x/ 38 Kings Park Road, West Perth, AUSTRALIA, 6005.
v Tel (61)-8-9324-1119, Mob 0401-054-155.
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
