In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 04/05/2007
at 06:05 AM, Steve Comstock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>For some reason, PL/I shops have tended to keep object code and they
>do a lot of re-linking
Because it's less hassle and more efficient. But that doesn't require
extraneous recompiles.
>1. If you call your routines statically, then when you
> change a subroutine its source must be recompiled
> and bound; then you can do a re-bind of the caller
> and your back together; no need to do a recompile
Which is the standard methodology.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
