... is there any partiicular advantage to supplying LEPARM on every ++MOD, rather than once-and-for-all in a UTILITY entry?
Sure, the advantage of LEPARM on ++MOD is that your MCS that you supply as the developer defines the module attributes. The UTILITY entry on the other hand is controlled by user; can you be sure the user defines it properly? Not to mention extra setup to define the UTILITY entry, and the UTILITY entry defines attributes used for ALL modules. The LEPARM on ++MOD lets you define independent attributes for each module.
As a user, I'd much rather you use LEPARM on ++MOD so I don't have to mess with the UTILITY entry parms.
Kurt Quackenbush -- IBM, SMP/E Development ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
