In a message dated 5/8/2007 9:48:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

It's not  that simple of course.  It has nothing to do with paging  counts
either.




>>
Since DFP 1.4, IBM recommends SMB vs BLSR. Might start small and see if it  
can
work in this situation. Certainly gives you better numbers to wave  around.
 
Some restrictions:
 
 
2.5.4.2 Tuning for System-Managed Buffering

VSAM can use a technique called system-managed buffering  (SMB
) to determine the  number of buffers and the type of buffer management to 
use for VSAM data sets.  VSAM also determines the number of buffers to locate 
in 
Hiperspace(TM) for use  in direct optimization.  
To indicate that VSAM is to use SMB, specify either of the following options: 
 
    *   Specify the ACCBIAS subparameter of the JCL DD statement AMP 
parameter and  an appropriate value for record access bias.  
    *   Specify Record Access Bias in the data class and an application 
processing  option in the ACB.  

For system-managed buffering (SMB), the data set must use both of the  
following options:  
    *   System Management Subsystem (SMS) storage  
    *   Extended format (DSNTYPE=ext in the data class)  

JCL takes precedence over the specification in the data class.  You must 
specify NSR. SMB either  weights or optimizes buffer handling toward sequential 
or 
direct processing.  
To optimize your extended format data sets, use the ACCBIAS subparameter of  
the AMP parameter along with related subparameters SMBVSP, SMBDFR, and SMBHWT. 
 You can also use these subparameters with Record Access Bias=SYSTEM in the 
data  class. These subparameters are only for Direct Optimized processing. 



************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to