> -----Original Message-----
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Greg Shirey
> 
> John,
> 
> I Googled '"out of band" FTP' and got a link to RFC 0529.  
> I'm no expert in IP networking, but to my reading, 
> out-of-band is sort of an interrupt caused by the ABOR.

Hmmm......  From Chris Mason's explanation I got the impression that the
ABOR subcommand was the "payload", and the "out of band" is somewhat
analogous to the SNA DFASY transmission.

>  So, 
> why did the client send the abort?  Could it be the timeout 
> value had passed?  I think the default is 120 seconds, but it 
> can be overridden.  
> 
> If this is a batch job, you might check your EZA1617I 
> messages in the aborted runs and see if your transfer rate 
> was running really slow at the time.

Not likely, because the batch FTP jobstep started and ended in the same
second.  Here's the message sequence:

EZA1736I APPEND  'ZOS.DATASET.NAME' +
EZA1736I         /AIX/pathname/filename.ext      
EZA1701I >>> SITE FIXrecfm 599 LRECL=599 RECFM=FB BLKSIZE=27554
500 'SITE FIXrecfm 599 LRECL=599 RECFM=FB BLKSIZE=27554'
EZA1701I >>> PORT ........                    
200 PORT command successful.                          
EZA1701I >>> APPE /AIX/pathname/filename.ext     
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for ....
426 Connection closed; transfer aborted.              
EZA1735I Std Return Code = 04426, Error Code = 00002  
EZA1701I >>> QUIT                                     
221                                                   
***** FILE TRANSFER FAILED 

It's as though z/OS said "just kidding" immediately after the 150 reply.

>  We've found IP traffic 
> to be so flaky that we coded a proc that runs a REXX that 
> attempts the FTP x number of times (4 as a default), sleeping 
> 30 seconds between attempts (adapted from something we 
> acquired from Terry Linsley somehow -- thanks, Terry).  And 
> all our batch jobs that need to FTP use the FTPRETRY proc - 
> most of them are successful on the first attempt, but many of 
> them wind up taking 2 or 3
> attempts.   And when the programmers discover a site they are 
> FTP'ing to
> that seems to fail a lot, they generally increase the timeout 
> value too.
> 
> 
> Anyway, our shop has viewed this unreliability in FTP 
> transfers as SOP (or WAD) and have adapted.  

OK, we may have to categorize this kind of situation as "unexplainable"
for the time being.

    -jc-

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to