In
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 05/17/2007
at 01:38 PM, Peter Relson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>No, the dsname cannot include &SYSR1.
>Nor is such functionality likely to be implemented.
Do you mean only that there are no plans to do so, or that a
requirement, if submitted, would probably be rejected?
I understand that you need to resolve the PARMLIB concatenation before
you can provide full symbol support, but substituting only &SYSR1 and
possibly allowing symbol definitions in LOADxx should be less work.
Would you advise the OP to submit a requirement, or is it a lost
cause?
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
