On Tue, 22 May 2007 07:54:03 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >>As far as I know, this job will run without error even if the owner >>has ACCESS=NONE to SYS1.WHATEVER. But for nearly three hours other >>users will be unable to allocate SYS1.WHATEVER. There ought to be >>enforcement of a rule against this. And, in my view, that >>enforcement ought more properly to be done not by allocation nor by >>the initiator, but by GRS, the most proximate component. > >That is not an informed view. GRS is the wrong component to make the >decision, even without taking performance into account. The only >reasonable place for the test is Allocation. > I had thought the lockout occurred even before the first invocation of Allocation. Is Allocation, in fact, entered at job initiation, perhaps well in advance of a reference to the data set name at a much later step?
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
