On Tue, 22 May 2007 09:12:10 -0300, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: > >>If all ENQs now performed with job scope were performed with job step >>scope, the "deadly embrace" would equally well be avoided. > >But the data sets would no longer be protected against concurrent >updates. > Thank you. I had overlooked that. (I might say "intervening" rather than "concurrent".)
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
