Alan Scott wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2007 20:19:37 -0400, John Eells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Which doesn't work for zFS. Which brings back similar issues
that there were when HFS had to be SMS controlled.
<snip>
True. For zFS the usercat with symbolic aliasing is the
alternative. (You can like it or despise it, but it's the
alternative we have.)
<snip>
That sounds a little heavy handed for IBM. Seems to me that if we complain
enough it gets changed. We have not converted to zFS as yet for this very
reason.
<snip>
I'm sorry if that seems heavy handed. I'm just telling you about
the world as it is (rather than as we might wish it were). We do
understand the problem; it is acceptable and affordable solutions
to it that we are a bit short of at the moment. But, please feel
free to submit a requirement if you wish. It can't hurt.
--
John Eells
z/OS Technical Marketing
IBM Poughkeepsie
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
