I'm sure Peter and his buddies could throw up several reasons against, but I think it would be advantageous for the placement in the LNKLST of these libraries to be honored. And the current rule to be followed if they are not listed.
It seems to me to be a little dumb to have to code at least a dummy library using special rules just to get this option followed. On Fri, 25 May 2007 07:14:25 -0500, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Peter Relson >> >> Unless you are using SYSLIB statements in PROGxx, it does not >> matter a bit where (or even if) SYS1.LINKLIB/MIGLIB/CSSLIB >> (and SIEALNKE / SIEAMIGE as of z/OS 1.8) appear in your >> LNKLST set definition. > >Hmmm..... Would it be fair to say those libraries are now >"automatically" linklisted? > >Would they also be "automatically" APF-authorized? > > -jc- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
