On Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:53:09 -0400, Craddock, Chris wrote: >> > >> > .... You could classify the STCs into the same service classes as >> > TSO.... >> >> Not a good idea. TSO should be defined with response time goals >> on the order of seconds (or fractions thereof) . That would be a >> very bad idea for a started task. > >Sorry Tom, you weren't paying attention. I wasn't suggesting you do that >for all STCs, but these particular STCs are actually running TSO. Hence >the need for the same (or at least related) service classes.
I was paying attention, and there's no reason to be insulting. Are you saying that WLM recognizes these started tasks as running under the TSO subsystem, and therefore recognizing commands issued as transactions? If so, they should not have "wildly different" performance characteristics. A transaction for a job or a started task is a step, not a TSO command. TSO response time goals are only meaningful when the TMP is run under the TSO subsystem. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
