On Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:49:23 -0400, Sharon Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I restore UA26500 back to the base of HDZ1180, do you think that I will >be ok? I'm due to roll my first 1.8 into production on June 17th and I've >already restored 2 ptfs on my test system, and frankly, I'm thinking about >postponing my upgrade because of all the information that I've received on >this list. > As always, you have to look at what the PTF was fixing to see if that problem is worse than the PE. In this case you have to go back in the chain to OA10292 - which was a timing issue. FWIW, I have 1.8 running on LPARs that run the utilities that David was having problems with. I don't have UA26500 applied because holddata kept me from doing so and (luckily) it wasn't applied and accepted with my ServerPac like it was with David. I have been burned by that exact situation with this upgrade and I really hope I can talk about this at SHARE with some of the IBM-ers. According to SMP/E - IGG0201B and IGG0201X are at base on my system, so to answer your question specifically, I think you are okay in regards to this particular issue if you restore UA26500. Of course, YMMV. Mark -- Mark Zelden Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead Zurich North America / Farmers Insurance Group: G-ITO mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] z/OS and OS390 expert at http://searchDataCenter.com/ateExperts/ Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/ Mark's MVS Utilities: http://home.flash.net/~mzelden/mvsutil.html ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
