Sorry - no zSeries content.

The idea of an IBM platform acting as a consolidation target for n x 100 
Windows servers is
not new, nor is it IBM's.

Perhaps a little more than a decade ago, Microsoft (and perhaps involving billg 
in person)
realized that a very small but not ignorable fraction of their user base had 
scalability
requirements that vastly exceeded what Intel and the server builders could cope 
with.

We're talking about a fraction of 1% of the Windows NT server installed base at 
that time.
Every now and then some new business gets it right and goes gangbusters.  There 
were some very
fundamental discussions, one problem being the disconnect between Microsoft and 
Intel.  Yes,
the large enterprise market is valuable, but most of that value is in software 
revenue -
invisible to Intel.  But graphics performance was - at the time - a lucrative 
market.  This
was at a time when Hercules graphics cards were going into Intel-based systems 
at twice the
price  of the Intel chip.  If you were Intel, where would you spend the money - 
MP efficiency
or graphics acceleration?

So there was a discussion (fact, not hypothesis) between IBM and Microsoft 
about the idea of
hosting a massively scalable Windows NT environment on IBM hardware.  My 
information is that
the discussions ended amicably after best efforts on both sides when it proved 
that IBM's
hardware development lead times could not be reconciled with the volatilty of 
Microsoft's
APIs.  At the time. Microsoft was exploiting API volatility as a competitive 
tool - IBM would
have found it relatively easy to implement any given state of the NT API set, 
but staying up
to date would have placed impossible loads on IBM's support structure.  
Enterprises have
different support requirements to mom-and-pop.

C'est la vie.  But it wasn't zSeries - it was iSeries.  Actually (heresy - I 
shall be beaten
up) much more scalable.

(Heading for the hills.)

P.S. (before this ships out)

To pick up on Tom Moulder:  I'm not aware of _ANY_ involvement of FLEX or 
Fundamental Software
in the _IBM_ versus _PSI_ lawsuit.  Indeed, I've commented several times on the 
deafening
silence from Fremont (and Ann Arbor).

Hercules references are a bad joke in this context and I just wish people would 
GROW UP and
stop making them.

A lot more care is needed, guys.

-- 
  Phil Payne
  http://www.isham-research.co.uk
  +44 7833 654 800

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to