I disagree. "The boss may not always be right, but he's still the
boss." :-(
Our COBOL-only staff has/had no reason to be diving into PARMLIB. In the
"old days" of IPS/ICS tuning, I got far too many complaints: "My
database shouldn't be pageable", "My TSO session should have a storage
fence.", etc. Tuning is for the business needs, NOT the individuals'
(perceived) needs
The overall business needs MUST be the first consideration.
Rick
Phil Knight wrote:
In this case politics led to security. Management decision (as it
should be).
----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Fochtman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: how to list LE options
----------------------<snip>-----------------------
Ditto....ever have "users" cruise your parmlib and then tell you how
to tune the system? Solution: UACC(NONE).
---------------------<unsnip>---------------------
I always figured it was b ecause that user had too much spare time.
Solution: notify his manager. Politics disallowed UACC(NONE).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
