In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on 06/11/2007
at 08:49 AM, "McKown, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>IEBUPDTE is very stupid, uh, simplistic.
The problem in this case isn't IEBUPDTE but SMP/E.
>When it reads a record from the existing member which has a sequence
>number equal to the update record's number, it uses the update
>record to replace the existing record.
If that's what you tell it to do. That's not the only way to use it.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
