On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 09:56:04 -0500, McKown, John wrote: >> Plainfield, IL > > ... IEFBR15 was based on the assumption that register 15 actually >points to the BCR 15,15 instruction. Unless you PTF'ed the program to >remove this dependancy by prefixing it with a BASR 15,0 instruction.
Just like IEFBR14 assumes that register 14 is the return address. So what's your point? That's how a program in a batch job gets control. Do you think IBM is going to change that? -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
