I think I have time to start looking into this. By now the thread veered off 
into 
complaints from eons ago. Most current compilers allow passing parameters in 
with the source code so JCL limitations are not what they once where for 
compile procs. The PARM='' limit has not changed. Asking IBM how to reach an 
undocumented or unsupported control block is not likely to get the results you 
want. If the have a callable interface then it would be documented.

Are you willing to follow control blocks, unsupported, if that is what it takes?

Have you given up or found a path to follow?


On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:17:57 -0500, Kirk Wolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Does anyone know how to read the current JCL symbols from a program?
>
>ASASYMB apparently won't do it.   Its frustrating, since you might be
>able to use for some interesting things.
>
>Thanks for any help,
>
>Kirk Wolf
>Dovetailed Technologies
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
>send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
>Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to