In a message dated 7/11/2007 5:53:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I located the PDS at location
>** TRACK(CCHH)  1A580000         R0  DATA  0000000000000000
>   COUNT  1A580000010005A0
>0000  6CD385A3 40E2A8A2 7EE5C1E3 5E404040  40404040  40404040 40404040
40404040
>0020  40404040 40404040 40404040 40404040  40404040  40404040 40404040
40404040
>0040  TO  009F   SAME AS ABOVE
 
Even worse than the absolute track number's being larger than 65535 is  the 
fact that what you show at that track number does not look at all like a  
standard IBM PDS.  If this is supposed to be the first track of the PDS,  then 
either your PDS has been hosed (e.g., re-written) or you have not found the  
first 
track of it correctly.  The Count field you show has a data length of  5A0, 
which is incorrect for a directory block, which should be 0100 (decimal  256).  
The data in that block looks seriously wrong for a directory  block.  The 
first 160 bytes which you show contain the following in  
EBCDIC/eyeball-readable 
form:  "'Let  Sys=VAT)       "  (or something like  that).  This data is 
completely inconsistent with what should be in any  block in a PDS directory.
 
Bill  Fairchild
Plainfield, IL





************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to