In a message dated 7/11/2007 2:05:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >If the DR site has sufficient tape drives, you could do 9 concurrent restores of -3s versus 1 restore of a -27. Assuming that the restore software uses maximally shrunk extents in their Define Extent CCWs, and assuming the DR site has sufficient PAVing, you could do 8 concurrent restores of -3s versus 1 restore of 8/9 of a -27, and then restore the last 1/9 of the -27 in a separate restore job. The total elapsed time would then be about twice the elapsed time of restoring a single -3 instead of nine times. Bill Fairchild Plainfield, IL
************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
