On Mon, 16 Jul 2007 00:31:26 +0800, Johnny Luo wrote:
>
>  ...   why IBM doesn't increase the clock of mainframe CPU?
>There is no need or there are some technical problems?

Actually, IBM is an acknowledged leader in processor design and
microelectronics technology.

I would suggest you read some of the articles in
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd51-12.html .
Particularly, http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd/511/mayer.html .

For some additional background, see
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd50-45.html
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd48-34.html
http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/rd46-45.html

You might think that 1.7 GHz is slow when you hear about Intel processor
clock rates, but z/Architecture is considerably more complex than any Intel
processor.  It is quite remarkable that such a large and complex processor
is able to achieve a cycle time that is equivalent to the time that it takes
light to travel about 7 inches.

-- 
Tom Marchant

-- 
Tom Marchant

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html

Reply via email to