Johnny Luo wrote:
Sorry for a newbie to jump in here...
But I have a question: why IBM doesn't increase the clock of mainframe CPU?
There is no need or there are some technical problems?
I'm now working at one customer's site and every day's afternoon is a
terrible time for all developers working on their development system: we
just cannot use TSO/ISPF! You must wait 4 or 5 seconds for a response and
sometimes you just hang there. The cause is that most teams will do their
batch tests at that time thus eating all of CPU cycles. I guess they might
need a more powerful CPU? (This situation has last for three months since I
came here)
THen - you may want to consider our suite of cross-platform tools - that
include a C compiler, a C++ compiler, a HLASM-compatible assembler
and a linker.
This has saved many people the cost of upgrading to new hardware.
See our link below...
- Dave Rivers -
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: (919) 676-0847
Get your mainframe programming tools at http://www.dignus.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
